No ruling yet in T&G v. WPD case

There is no immediate ruling after a session today to discuss the T&G’s ongoing case against Chief Gary Gemme, the City of Worcester, and the Worcester Police Department.

The newspaper had sought to have four of the released Officer Mark Rojas complaints, virtually entirely redacted, released again with fewer redactions or entirely unredacted.

Early this morning, an intervening motion was filed by Attorney Gary Nolan from the Police Benevolant Association on behalf of Officer Rojas, saying Rojas deserved to be represented individually in the case.

While there is no ruling at this time on the T&G‘s motion to have some of the records unredacted, the judge did hint at one point that he felt an interim, halfway step might be the best solution. “I have to grant some form of relief…so the privacy [exemption claimed by the city] can be explored.”

At another point, the judge asked, “How will everybody ever know if the chief made the right decision?”

And earlier in the hearing he remarked, “It appears [the police] used a pretty heavy club…I don’t think there’s any subtelty [in their redactions].”

At this point, one of the city’s and PBA’s main claims is that Rojas’ privacy must be protected, though City Solicitor David Moore also said complainants privacy was at the heart of the case.

The city is arguing that at least two of the four heavily redacted complaints should not be unredacted, as they in some way involve Rojas’ relationships with other individuals.

T&G Attorney Vincent O’Rourke allowed that he would be ok with “Redaction in a way that allows both [privacy and public information] to be possible.”

But, he said, waving a copy of a blacked out report, “What he have now is a joke.”

“The problem is we have someone who is putting themselves above the court and above the law.”

For his part, Moore called the T&G position on the case “extreme,” and Nolan reiterated the importance of maintaining a degree of privacy for Rojas.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “No ruling yet in T&G v. WPD case

  1. Pingback: RojasGate - episode 7 : Real Worcester - Worcester News and Blogs

  2. P.M.

    I wonder how long it will take the judge to rule…how are judges not biased? They must read the papers and also get feeback from other policcal people…

  3. P.M.

    Frustrating part iswhile other officers are working hard, the taxpayers are paying for Rojas to sit at home and not have to work for all these months while this unravels in court…nice.

  4. J. Madison

    Degree of privacy?
    Nolan’s gotta be kidding. Is that gut stupid or something.
    Stupid is, as stupid does.
    Rojas is bad news. Always was.
    And we got a CoP (Chief of Police) who doesn’t have the intestinal fortitude to do the right thing.
    Stand up to the union by firing Rojas.
    Man, egos and unions always get in the way of logic huh?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s