Rushton’s request for a study narrowly passes, 6-5. Irish, Perotto, Petty, Rushton, Smith, Toomey voted in favor. There was some snippiness between Rushton and Lukes that is still going on. More on that post-meeting, but it is going to be two long years if these two dont work something out.
UPDATE: The above item is correct–I just confirmed with the City Clerk’s office that the order did pass 6-5, with the vote tally above.
3 Comments
November 14, 2007 at 9:58 am
This is very confusing… you say it narrowly passed, and the T&G says it didn’t pass… but both say 6-5
http://www.telegram.com/article/20071114/NEWS/711140646/1101
November 14, 2007 at 1:28 pm
The study is dead in the T&G, yet passed here….
The T&G has had some technical difficulties with the primary and general election reports, but this is a policy issue. They do usually get that stuff.
They list;
AGAINST: Konnie, Petty, Rosen, Clancy, Haller, Palmeiri
FOR: Rushton, Toomey, Irish, Perotto, Smith
November 14, 2007 at 1:32 pm
Whoa!
Confirmed even….
That is pretty amazing!
The T&G is ’slightly rusty’ on Worcester vote tallies of late.
This election-blog is sure proving its worth.
Way to scoop!